How To Sew A Saddle Pad

Love the new communism. Alain's approach Badieu

I like to check the plasticity ideology of communism, like viruses, to cohabit with any other ideology. The one now before us, and represents Alain Badieu in this interview , communism is a very typical new age.

Since it is not the class struggle that concentrates the break with capitalism, or even already in the hands of the intelligentsia or the knowledge as he had argued Lukacs, no, now is the concept of love that makes the revolutionary march of communism.

This claim is debatable axioms:

A. - "We have established a system of existence in which everything must be transformed into product, a commodity." For Mr. Badieu that Marx had already predicted. Unfortunately, the German philosopher was unable to provide that communism would end up turning the man in the commodity of your system.
If something today's economy is characterized by diminishing concern about the product and another for service. If all mp3 players are equally good or bad then where is the secret of Apple?, If coffee is just as good or not in any neighborhood café, why Starbucks wins?, Why do Gmail and Hotmail and Google and not Internet Explorer?, why BMW sells more cars than Mercedes? Could put a thousand examples to show that we are in a service economy rather than product.

B. - "A society that is not governed by the fact that a man pursues his interest but by the idea of \u200b\u200bthe association of men. Is that the association that defines the projects or collective goals. " But does not explain how will decide or who will take the reins which go to make decisions and goals. Nor is it clear what would happen if an individual decides not to join that group. The main problem with communism is its ability to dilute the value of the individual, the person in favor of the mass. Millions of people have died from the common idea of \u200b\u200ban egalitarian, proletarian state, in defense of true religion and the supremacy of one race. To achieve this, the first step is to destroy individuality, difference. The person is not more important than the state, class, faith, etc. and when this happens, generally, the concept of respect for life are blurred, because what has value human life against the interest of the common good or collective.

therefore no wonder the fear that technology, especially internet, you are given. The ability to dissent, incoformismo, debate and mechanism of identification with communication technologies, cause real fear among those who difienden to ground. The free movement of knowledge and information, apparently, do not please Badieu, and calling the "false egalitarianism," one of the most important revolutions in the history of mankind. In the end, is aware that the need for communism by mass forces a standardization and homogeneity that is not possible if essentially, in our thinking, debate is allowed, free knowledge and the unrestricted flow of ideas.

C. - We must be careful not to confuse concepts apparently equal. Hobbes speaks of struggle and not competition and here are the nuances in these cases, important, especially for a philosopher who claims to be a student of a leading intellectual of analytic philosophy and Derrida. In war fighting, competing in sports. Perhaps this example will be the clearest way of framing the problem. The competition involves taking of personal values \u200b\u200bwhile respecting the contrary. That does not happen in the fight.

But we go further, we accept the premise of taking the association as the main axis. Communism certainly has no place in this concept from the moment we accept that dissent is not allowed. One of the features of the voluntary associations to which members enter. However, still no answer to the question of who will do the work distribution of goods and services in material terms.

However, capitalism itself. Is self-interest, selfishness, which leads to a voluntary association and the other for logara what we have and need. The market is only self-association of suppliers and consumers to address their needs through trade.

D. - Returning the need for a unifying element in our theory all masses, in this case is the love that fulfills the role of attractor. But who defines what kind of love, will it be valid any kind of love?, Independent love are we talking about sex?, Do you accept homosexuality or bisexuality as a love, or only heterosexual? Is allow the love of efebos as in Classical Greece?, is it a love of the divine? One thing is clear, has a particular conception of love, and that what for many is acceptable for him not: "Today it looks tame love with a mix of free porn ...."

Moreover, this competition is blurred in the loving on the other, how it fits into the romantic love that stands true? And if your partner decides to have an open relationship, are not we then have a case of complete surrender to the mass?, Would not it be a way to eliminate competition, selfishness, individualism struggles and absolute dedication to all those people they do not feel like relationships?

Finally, how is it possible to defend the love being Maoist Marxist theory was even decide how many children a family should have, cause a real murder and abandonment of female children in China, is it that the love that stands Badieu, a love that the state may regulate?

Zebra Paper Wedding Programs

The importance of the road and the goal

differ in economic policy on the one hand what is called the objectives of the "economic policy" and on the other hand, the instruments. The first reference to the goals or targets to which to direct the efforts of responsible economic policy, such as employment, inflation control, economic growth, etc. To fulfill these objectives, the "policy maker" has the tools, which can be defined as the path or route to be followed to achieve the desired goal. It is desirable and necessary therefore that objectives and instruments are alienated to achieve the desired results.

However, currently there is no such consensus between the goal and the road, as it can be seen the words written by the economist and journalist Joaquin Estefania . In an opinion piece for the newspaper COUNTRY "8th of November, under the title" Achilles heels G-20, "reads: "[...] will resolve the dispute raised three months ago in Toronto: If the main problem is economic growth or fiscal consolidation, areas faced by its members. Though a bit schematic put in such a way solve the problems of unemployment and disposable income is what is required particularly to citizens while markets (increasingly demanding) want the fixed date back to fiscal discipline and orthodoxy. "

From the perspective of Mr. Estefania , market and people go every man for himself, the former being unable to respond to the needs of the second, becoming the state in economic agents should provide a solution to the demands of citizenship. Unfortunately, the interventionist rhetoric defends the author is not the answer. Millions of euros spent on expansionary fiscal policies through public spending out of control, have only served to generate higher unemployment, uncontrolled state debt, lower disposable income due to future tax increases that are being passed and approved in the nearest future, lower economic growth. Excluding the decline in all of this is valuable for individual freedom. Is what usually happens when you ignore the market and falls in the fatal conceit that beautifully describes the Nobel economics teacher and FA Hayek .

If we analyze well the very appointment of Joaquin Estefania see that there is no contradiction between what the citizens want and what the market demands. The first we make the goal and the second way, in terms of economic policy we can say that people want to achieve the objectives of employment, income and economic growth as the market indicates that we must use the tools of a restrictive fiscal policy disciplined combined with a return to control public expenditure. As rightly pointed out liberalism, the only mechanism capable of giving a proper and effective response to the demands and needs of individuals is the market. While our leaders continue to face the market, while still thinking they are the solution and stop solutions advised by economists as Joaquin Estefania, the out of the crisis will be long and the end of the road that we all desire will never be achieved.

Gemmy Holiday Light Show

banking system and its implications (I)


internet

Walk a protest against the banking system which of course has already created a group on Facebook, December 7: Day of protest banks across Europe . Basically consists of removing the funds as clients have deposited in banks in which we are customers. I've read several blogs and a brief introduction that sets out in the group and not clear to me why which organizes the event. Personally I think there are two reasons totally incompatible with each other: the first is a critique of fractional-reserve system, the second disaster drawer where basically meet those who want to stop the system without more. To all this must be added a general lack of knowledge of how the mechanisms of monetary policy of central banks, fiscal policies and the actual state with fractional reserve banking.

Dealing with all these issues here would a post worthy of a book, so I will focus mainly on criticizing the fractional system, because I will pass explain the operation of monetary policy.

The current banking system operates under what economists call fractional reserve. This means that banks are only required to keep on hand a part of all the money their customers have deposited in them is what is known as the technical reserve requirements, a legal share in the monetary union marked by Central Bank and U.S. Federal Reserve. Currently this ratio is 2%.

To better explain, if a bank has in its coffers € 100, under the law of the minimum reserves can provide save only € 98 and € 2. What is legally available to those Euros? As provided in the form of credits, loans, etc. What does that? Generate additional money (money held by the public and bank deposits), which is technically called the money multiplier. It provides funding from the creation of companies to buy our house. Because the role of banks is the intermediary, ie, to communicate those with financial capacity to those with financial needs. And where they keep the 2% the banks? For in the various Central Banks on their part. In the case of Spain in the European Central Bank.

hope you have been able to clearly explain these concepts and the initial situation, I can enter and to detail what is known as monetary policy. Central banks have a simple and basic three tools to carry out its operations in the money market. Market operations open mainly based on modifying the official interest rate money and standing facilities, the cash ratio.

The instrument used has long been the central rate of interest, which is to mark the minimum interest rate which the central bank will stop lending money to various banks participating in the system. This means that if a bank like Capital SA needs to ask € 1,000 million to BC and the rate rises from 1.2% to 1.25% this means that you'll pay more and perhaps financed decide not to attend this auction and reorganize its business, may grant make fewer loans and interest rates to their customers more expensive.

Currently, central banks are operating in the market with extraordinary measures such as buying debt, which means nothing more than financing the government so it can continue its pace of spending. This operation was prohibited by the law regulating the operation of central banks and it has been necessary to modify the rules to allow this operation.

Is it advantageous for central banks such operations? Of course, now the main funding mechanisms are very expensive as the case of interbank market (the system where different banks lend money to each other), because no one trusts his neighbor. And even though central banks are taking huge financial facilities, banks require guarantees and as such offer the same debt purchasing and central bankers have decided to accept. Basically this is money leaving the state to pay an interest rate of 2% for example, going to the Central Bank and borrow money at 1% and leave change to guarantee the payment of public debt in exchange the bank earns differential, ie, 1%.

Looking for spoil banks to the States? No, because it would go against their interests, and that would collect outstanding debts and guarantees frete Central Bank would have no value. Furthermore, in an interconnected system as a case of this type would be a domino collapse of all stakeholders and a disaster for the world economy.

Do they generate debt

banks and central banks? Depends on debt are talking about. If it is private debt, it is clear that this has been part of their business and their role. If we talk about public debt or state, we have seen that your purchase was prohibited by the Central Banks and therefore only the banks could buy this type of instrument Financial.

-debt Is the main goal of the banking system? No, because the banking business consists of two legs, the assets and liabilities. By assets we mean the loans or credit from other banking products, money deposited by liabilities in the accounts of customers. And between the two entities must be a balance that closely monitored the international rules of the Bank for International Settlements in Basel BIS regulations I, II and now III. To be able to leave money, banks should not have many assets on its balance sheet, so if you are heavily indebted, will come a point where one of the ways to make money is depleted.

hope I have explained certain concepts on the functioning of the banking system within the financial system and the use of monetary policy and its instruments. In the next post I will discuss the opinion that to me, means to operate under a fractional reserve system and of course, to answer the questions and concerns that reading this entry exist.

Gay Beats Sydney Wentworhville

Unions and Strike

A very good friend asked me a few days ago my personal opinion about the unions in this country and its behavior in the general strike on September 29. I said that the strike had no basis for his call and that the unions demonstrated once again I found apart from the real problems of the workers they supposedly represent.

However, what is the true image of the unions? Let's see:

a) Spain shows one of the union membership rate lowest in Europe: only 15% compared to rates close to 70% in countries like Sweden, Finland and Denmark.

b) The number of released labor is 57,000 people, ie people who spend hours of work to union representation of workers in their workplaces. The total cost of the union released to businesses is more than 1,600 million a year.

c) The financing does not come mainly from membership fees but via public financing: in 2010 the unions received directly from state coffers the amount of 15,798,500 euros. Add to that the funding they receive training under the Tripartite Foundation, whose numbers reach 172,667,675.5 amounts of euros. Needless to say, is known to all the activities of the Foundation and how effectively it works (sic). Another minor detail is that the money is received before the courses were funded, which has already caused a scandal like the one in the case FORCEM. To this we must clarify that all workers detract us a monthly amount 1.65% for training.

d) Most of the venues that inhabit the unions belong to the National Heritage and therefore do not pay any rent. Are more than 600,000 square feet and represent a cost around (below market) of 180 million euros to be saved.

However, if these figures were not outrageous enough, we must join the main feature of trade unions in Spain for me: total impunity. When calling a strike and go to her in full possession of his duties, act with arrogance known to be protected and shielded by the ineffectiveness of the law. As there is no right to strike, the constitution contains the same right for workers who decide not go there.

Well, these defenders of democracy fall on coercion and more sneaky and criminal acts that may know, under a total impunity to force everyone to drink the water. Anything goes. From sealed with glue doors, gates and shutters of shops, creating flaming barricades and debris to prevent entry or exit sites and industrial areas, blocking roads, cutting transportation and services minimum and of course, coercion and verbal and physical threats against those who fail to comply with its mandates.

These videos are an example of the democratic arts of information pickets:

Jobs In Mcdonalds In Brampton

Fiestas Patrias



Stop the Guea, Shila Shile Shilen, the largest vamdera, the largest Asao, pisco Shilene, ConPro its pulenta plasma hornidario Culiao country, how much feeling Shilene? Shilene is fashionable to be the most developed sector, a country with Gen street Transantiago, the auto Pulentos nueesitos, Any Key Monea by copper, the mining enterrao i pal pico, i abla people so incredible that cer Shilene " ce how it happens to walk by cer cintiendoce Shilene? When this country reculiao is the one more difference between the haves and have-nots Moneo, a town Culiao desmemoriao the Mapuche, the owners of the country Why not leave shit in the Indian country i to the gueas agan that they like Cosa
reculiaos apart are the soldiers who boast showing his toy pistol as a tag, win Moneasa, spending our Moneasa in pure Guea, paying pensions to the milico reculiao, milico's wife and daughter reculiao reculiao milico, people do not na qe important in life but ate like kings of Malaysian jueran more shit i do that Genaro Guaton bibe the house guelta . That
Guea of \u200b\u200bpara military why not to ban their caution milicos mariconiar reconchasdesumadre?
Tele gueas full of patriotic, telecerie patriotic, flag waving in toas part ci THIS GUIDE is life would be like walking pa placing flags coolies
Best builds for terremetiaos Guenes shacks, pa poor people, we Guea us of cer Bend the Chilean political Culiao, milicos Culiao, métance oginin the crack at the race and throw it in guelta prat to RRIO. 18, sestiembre
Culiao.

conchesumare Bayance the

How Long Does Aspartame Withdrawal Last

The crisis in the euro zone has never existed. My response.

The blog Let's talk about our stuff in a links an input opinion entitled: "The crisis in the euro zone has never existed." This is my response to the request for our opinion that Alvaro, the author of the blog, you ask us.

I read the news you've bonded very closely. And I describe my impressions.

I find an article very superficial and very difficult to maintain claims. Let's see:

The author argues that this crisis is "a crisis of customers, where the recession is caused by the lack of customers in the domestic market (not government debts), caused by the fact that the English suffered unemployment and therefore do not have enough private demand, nor could hold or lift the economy based on exports and rising wages. "

Here it is clear that ignores the true origin of the crisis is upon us, which has gone through several stages which also confuses. The birth of this crisis is the clear involvement of financial and banking markets by central banks when determining the volume of money supply. I left two links to two great videos that explain the core of a clear and concise. The first is a rap and the second teacher of Soto Huerta .

Write the author at another point: "None of the PIGS, even Greece, had come in default of payment, to discuss debt crisis ..." There is no need to fall into default to talk about a debt crisis. What is important in the market where you money is if you are able to return, that is, if your economic structure is sufficiently stable to implying hold back the principal plus the amount of what you have borrowed. In business terms, the market looks attentively at your cash flow, your ability to generate cash to meet payments. An economy that breaks the unemployment statistics, he had no plans to stop spending or raising taxes, as was the case of Spain before the wake-up call, is running for that every time you leave money, asked more type interest, which plays against because it increases their final debt. That was the problem of Spain and Greece. There was confidence that they were able to meet payments. The market would not be against them but that they were implementing incorrect policies.

go on. I quote again: "Deutsche Bank bet on Spain to fall short. If I could fall, the bank earns a lot of money." No, here the author is confusing the stock market short positions, which affect companies with a "debt default" by a country like Spain. The Deutsche Bank opted for certain companies would fall in the market price of its shares, which will accrue benefits for their short positions. This has nothing to do with about 202,000 million dollars that the German bank has on government debt bonds of the Kingdom of Spain. If Spain goes bankrupt, the bank literally run out of money.

A great idea, but badly interpreted and discussed is the one mentioned here: "The deal was that U.S. banks borrow from the Fed at a rate of almost 0% and buy bonds of European countries in crisis are between 3% and 10% and removed speculative gain "Yes, that's a big deal for any bank. But the fault here is the first of the Fed, and after European governments for breaking Fiscal Stability policies agreed in Maastricht.

The real problem is not that European debt buying U.S. banks, but the effect is known as "crowding out or crowding out. That means U.S. banks have closed the tap private investment have been decided by public investment. In short, do not lend money to entrepreneurs and people like you and me, because they are leaving the state.

addition, here is an overwhelming logic shows that the author does not understand very well what he is talking. Imagine you are a senior executive of Goldman Sachs, you borrow money to buy bonds and the Fed and European debt. What we want is that these bonds will get paid. If the euro goes bankrupt and not pay, you owe money to the Fed and even above, you worthless worthless bonds in the form of European government debt.

I think an article, as I said, very weak, confused and with an intention that I can not see.

Women Showing Their Boobs In Saree

TRAPPED MINERS AND IMPORTANT OLD





pueen not take qe Qe pueen take, that mine is not taken, to send them a glass of wine. Glass of bino! Aonda saw the toad Culiao ban him walking to the glass of bino mining cer arto qe ay agueonao think glass, qe the other says that pueen traguillo go crazy with that ci ece qere not give it to another and another and do take ce qe ce Guea hands it could occur to escape. First Guea
with the ban lunatics out terible famous, not ban him walking taking some wine in a box, the crazy altodelcarmen ban to take up, bacandy rum, and whiskey without a hangover, so it's nice wine put it pueen the crack.
Guea Second, the mineron have any cove crest, ci embaraos you send the berries, do you think the ban ce to eat?, Have a gentle chicha macerating and should be putting the best day tufts pa toos sleep peacefully.
gueone Miners are not, need not send them forelock, if not more accentuated ayya it and take it, and the Guea auquqe is not the best chicha, like no more, too pa with guasca curarce already entered. Ci
to be caught is not like the cane, how crazy are not crazy attitude of cane, but if you take the tempering pa gueas ugly hai no policeman, the cops seem Culiao Hunnic that are Culiao minister. Qe
So Mr. Minister, enbes guided walking one or two glasses, send Artira marijuana tired, tired asao Pulenta and fruit and vegetables, and of course more pituco crested, pa that goats, in the absence of mines, to sleep with one hand on the bottle and one hand on the horn

Shaving Tools For Men

The true face of Che

Alberto Korda has created a global icon with the famous photograph of Ernesto "Che" Guevara. Unfortunately, there is a veil of darkness and concealment of the true image has been tilted by many of his detractors as "the butcher of the Shack." The above Shack was a colonial fort taken by the revolutionary forces took control of Che. During her tenure were conducted summary trials and executions without any legal guarantee. The first victims were soldiers of the dictator Batista and later even farmers and villagers against the confiscation of their property.

Che never hid those atrocities and acknowledged these crimes in a speech given at an Assembly of the United Nations on December 11, 1964, where he said:

"We must say here that is a known truth that the We have always expressed to the world: shootings, yes, we shot, shoot them and continue by shooting. "

That is the true face of the revolutionary, a cruel and ruthless murderer, perhaps for this reason, the iconic photograph by Alberto Korda should have been this:

Genital Tattoos For Men

The Catalan Parliament just banned bullfights in the community with a score of 68 for YES, 55 NO and 9 abstentions. Some say that with this resolution the winners are the bulls, who see will no longer be "sacrificed" in a bloody spectacle of bad taste. However, I do not think that those who benefit most are the bulls, but the nationalists.

In Catalonia, the nationalist-leaning parties have long, as in the rest of Spain where there are these political groups, trying to erase everything that smacks of Spain as a nation. Wanted: after all, create a new reality that not consistent with the general sentiment of the population, even to create new-style conflicts around issues where previously none existed, creating unnecessary social unrest and divert the pressure of public opinion on issues that really matter.

is the case with mandatory labeling for all trade in Catalan, with astronomical fines for those who refuse to do so, the law of compulsory dubbing into Catalan, the refusal to allow the drivers placed flags of Spain in their taxis when selecting won the world, and now happens with the bullfight.

Because the real problem is not that Catalonia and the Parliament have discovered abuse in the National Party, not dear readers. What they discovered is that nationalist groups in the arguments of the dignity of the bull, you can get a political victory against the enemy that is Spain and everything it represents. Thus, it is done away with a savage act towards the show, but to prohibit a national symbol as representative of Spain as the bull and the bull. At the end of the day, it was not the first politician who has also proposed to prohibit selling dolls dressed in flamenco at newsagents in Catalonia.

I do not like the bulls, I can never support a bloody spectacle as bullfighting. Therefore, never enter into a square of bulls for a show like that. However, that I do not like does not mean that those who do enjoy the art of bullfighting and accounting practice, can do so in freedom.

If one is an advocate of animal dignity, for ideological consistency should be anyway. That is, if one is against the bulls, should be similarly to the San Fermin festival, ants strip Laza, the "festa do boi Allariz " (feast of the ox) or fights roosters in the Canary Islands, where you looked, previously banned bullfighting. But to go a bit beyond me wonder: Will Catalan nationalists willing, as defenders of the dignity of the bull, also ban "bous embolats " that both have roots in Catalonia?

Also, I have the strange feeling that the vast majority of those who advocate the abolition of the Fiesta with arguments pro-life and respect for the animal, and never be seen in demonstrations and acts against a real murder as is abortion. These ultra-lifers then forget that just passed a law in Spain that can kill a human life that is unable to defend themselves and even above, should be the State who fund and permits.

Polyps In Roof Of Mouth

Bulls and Catalonia SPAIN SOCCER WORLD CHAMPION! A photo

CHAMPIONS, CHAMPIONS, OEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE OE OE! NO SLEEP WITH YOU IF YOU PURSUE EFFORT AND PASSION, does not become REALITY.

Cool Things Like Poptropica To Join

I will ask a favor, if you like the photo, click on the link, dense high as fans of MADPHOTO and burn like the option. Make a little happier this is writing here: D

http://www.facebook.com/MADPHOTO.es # / photo.php? Pid = 4610379 & id = 89486653013

How Fast Is 4 Hp Motor

Silicon dead, long live the neochips! Nonsense

Reading

Remove Chair Sperm Stain

Culi

OLD Culi

No social class that can resist or hair color or texture that somatic contemporary Chilean with this lady. Has its own life and is reproduced with the water, like gremlins, that mythical creature of evil nature of the Saxon tradition. Some are ugly, pretty, skinny and fat, can be young ladies or old soul coolies. Socially and economically no aspirations are always praying to God not lacking anything. The old coolie never invited to anything. It has no checkbook and is dependent on everything. When an old coolie is invited to a restaurant called the richest ever, but more expensive. An old coolie will never take anything, because there is the old coolie to be entrepreneurial.

If they live in homes swept the sidewalk only with the intention of the movement of residents. If you live in apartments, shake the cloth with the bread crumbs out the window with the same intent. Basically there are Sapas. They drink wine and arranged, but you make eyes at the piscola. When you are visiting another house, watch everything with arrest, then tell envy or the ugly of pottery or how bad it was the eleven to another witch who also belongs to his condition.

not know that in the neighborhood condominium or tell old coolies.

Some vehemently defend themselves when someone they see who "coolie if not old," "repeat with eyes full of hatred. At the end is like an old coolie. Who offends (can be male or female), says "the reculia old shit." It then enters a sublimation of the old coolies, passing a state or higher order.

The old coolie live and breathe the same polluted air. Listen to news and comments. If you leave the field of education emits a growl that says "it's not like before, they had been given a stick to these unfortunate goats", without knowing a bit of educational reform. If pollution levels increasing says "if it is good and therefore to pollute", while she herself is burning leaves trail in environmental preemergence. If you work in an office, the old coolie coolie another witch tambibservan all with social detencilase that can resist or hair color or texture that somatic Chilean contemporary with this lady. instead of poop in the toilet of women, it does in men, only to annoy. It is cynical and only apologizes when you go to church.

the end you end up wanting to old coolie, because in every family there is one, but several, which in time are actually older than coolies. Surely many have a mother or a grandmother or a girlfriend or a daughter who is an old coolie of the brave, old classic model coolies.

But there is an old coolie if it is dangerous. Is being in this category and living as a practitioner of your condition, takes a position in the government half, assistant director of some low-riding or consultant whatever. An old coolie in power is something evil and dangerous for democracy. I do not know how to use, use fear as a tool to keep a little calm and send subordinates to fire without pity to bother you or who crosses his path. An old coolie of these features lies blatantly and do not mind. If someone has secretly as Yasna Provoste is discarded from office. Sometimes hates women but for their socialist discourse seems not. May or may not marry a minister. If so, the old coolie becomes a demonic power, much like the smell of shit coming out in each of their decisions. This type of old coolie must be kept away, and other congeners of this description seem a slurry for bus next to this beast without ethics and no morals.

Care citizens of the world, very careful with this old coolies.

Angela Pitts Nipple Slip

sgaenianas

The brilliant economist Carlos Rodríguez Braun publishes occasional opinion column in a section titled "economic nonsense", which has released a compilation book . The intention of this column is to show the reader interested, as interventionist rhetoric is capable of reaching absurdities of all kinds, provided again and again to justify a state intrusion on an individual basis, or whatever it is, in personal freedom of every individual. Although I did not come up to the great Mr. Rodríguez Braun going to copy his style, because I think SGAE that does not go so short of nonsense to justify their model of extortion. Do not believe me? I'll show you.

The newspaper Expansion stated in an interview, has today, Monday May 24, 2010, the following statements by Mr. Bautista, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the SGAE, "If left unchecked Internet no one will invest in new ideas and talent. " What, how they have left the body? Surprised? For though the rest of the text is priceless I am going to focus exclusively on the above statement, first, because it represents what everyone already suspected, that completely ignores what is really Internet means and, secondly, to think that creativity is easily destroyed.

I published some years ago, a monograph on the theme entries: "The blackmail of the movie and record: a sociological approach I , II , III and IV . There exposed because one of the reasons why these businesses are unable to cope with the social phenomena of the Internet, is that really know what it means Internet, as does Mr. Bautista.

I quote :

; In the history Internet, we can draw a conclusion quite striking, the origin of the Net was an impulse conducted by several parties: the research universities, military research and the culture of freedom, as well Castells states: "Internet was born in the unlikely crossroads of great science, military research and libertarian culture "(Castells, M. 2003, 34)

unaware of the origins of the network of networks can lead to understanding the Internet as something very different from what actually be found on its intrinsic. And as I mention in the entry first monographic series:

libertarian culture [...] is a feature more characteristic of the development of the Internet, as few technological and scientific advances have been based on the culture of freedom as the network of networks, also because this culture of freedom had its origins on college campuses where it began to take the first steps of Internet, hence this culture not only characterizes the Internet, but also affects one of the main factors that fostered its creation.

And the second post, we see that Manuel Castells says:

[...] "The rapid spread of communication protocols computers would not have taken place without the free and open distribution of software and sharing of resources, which became the code of conduct of the first hackers. [...] Most of the networks required a backbone (backhbone) anchored on more powerful machines and that was only possible due to contact between science-based networks and communities of hackers in universities "(Castells, M. 2003, 43). Universities become the epicenter of the relations between the Orthodox and a scientific subculture and counterculture ideals were the hacker community, which also belonged to teachers and scientists.

Which brings us to:

[...] say that the great feature of Internet freedom, the ability to freely express knowledge and resources, to share and improve together, the network of networks, we can say that therefore, the Internet architecture is mainly an open architecture. (Castells, M. 2003, 45). And that's the secret of the rapid growth of Internet, the internal capacity of its training structure, its architecture, which allows the object to be constantly forming during use, allowing failures to realize that you have and try to solve when, together, to improve the final product and for this to occur, must be met Castells describes three conditions: first, the network architecture must be open, decentralized, distributed and multidirectional interactivity, secondly, all communication protocols and their development should be open, and be distributed freely [...] subject to change and thirdly the institutions that manage the network should be constructed in accordance with the principles of transparency and cooperation that are inherent to the Internet. "(Castells, M. 2003, 49)

And there, in the last sentence of Mr. Castells is the crux of this whole matter, any organization that works Internet must be built on the principles of transparency and cooperation that are inherent to the network. And those who have proved better suited the users, all?, No clearly not all. Castells speaks of two types: producers - users and consumers - users. The former have an active and feed back against the passive attitude and way of the latter. In fact, the latter involving fewer habitual Internet profile, where what is known as Web 2.0 has been possible thanks to the continued development of the first.

Producers - users are structured in turn, according to Castells:

"culture tecnomeritocrática, hacker culture (see Himanen, P. 2001, 155-157) , the virtual community's culture and entrepreneurial culture. Together contribute to an ideology of freedom widespread in the Internet world. "(Castells, M. 2003, 58).

And what is the value that unites all these groups: [...]

freedom. Freedom to create, freedom to absorb the knowledge available and free to redistribute this knowledge in the form and the selected channel. We

and insistence on control by Mr. Bautista, is a clear reflection of ignore the fundamental value of the Internet: freedom. And the only way to end our freedom is through coercion and state intervention. Mr. Bautista could well join the cast of characters who populate the "economic nonsense" Professor Braun.

On the Internet possibility that a free end with new ideas and talent, the second point I want to develop, is only a logical consequence of the first. Mr. Bautista, with its regulatory vision of the network, you can only see in confined spaces and creating drawings, specific places where this process, ie, labels, film producers, building departments, etc.. Creative activity which can only play a number of people eligible.

However, if the Internet has shown us anything, is that talent is everywhere and not just in certain places or people. And never a tool like the Internet has enabled an explosion so strong building, talent and innovation in the history of mankind. Including talent management, creativity and innovation have penetrated the Internet by business organizations. The philosophy that permeates the network to the new management has permeated overthrowing the old hierarchical structures of vertical cut and pyramidal other in a network to exploit the potential of all the constituent parts.

Therefore, however much it hurts to Mr. Bautista, the Internet, you can not regulate in any way, because otherwise we end up with a fundamental aspect or network efe them and not doing so will enhance creativity, precisely because it has shown us a free Internet is that there is no better way to develop new ideas and promote the creation philosophy of freedom that underlies the Internet.

White Lump On Piercing

CHAMPIONS LEAGUE! And now

IS OUR LEAGUE !!!!!!!!!!!!

time ago placed

I Found A Lump On My Anus

Keynes who saves us?

a rap video on one of the most important current debates taking place in economic theory. Both positions, summarized very much, say

a) Keynes: When an economy goes into recession, the State must supplement the lack of private demand by public demand through spending. Thus, consumption is encouraged, resulting in the activity and avoid a drop in unemployment. To make matters worse, the government must be very hard on savers, saving as consumption slows this, hurting economic activity. It is a question of money flooding the economy through fiscal and monetary policy loose.

b) Hayek: Like all economists of the Austrian School of Economics, says that the blame for the economic cycles are due to previous credit expansions, causing an unrealistic assessment of the risks involved when investing. The economy has so much money floating around to come a point, all future investment projects appear profitable. After a time, eventually overheated economy, where price increases resulting in a dangerous inflation, leading central banks to cut their losses the flood of easy money. It is at that moment, when the lack of liquidity starts to take its toll on projects previously appeared profitable but which now are not. Excessive indebtedness of the economy begins to lead to increased savings, to pay debts, causing a decline in consumption, productivity and therefore higher unemployment.

For Hayek, the Keynesian solutions based on increased government spending, are such as giving more alcohol to a drunk with a hangover, that is, solve the headache in the short term, but do not eradicate the real problem is the addition to cheap money . In addition, states tend to spend in times of economic weakness over its revenue collection capabilities, resulting in government debt caused by the fiscal deficit. Further aggravating the situation. Why?

Because this debt must be paid some day, because we must remember that the state is not productive, but that is financed through taxes. If we have an expansive fiscal policy and public spending increases without tax increases, will end up with no money and in debt.

That is the English problem. The government of Mr. Zapatero joined the populist promises of 400 € and check the baby (at the time criticized for having a very high cost), a dramatic increase in public expenditure for social policies of all kinds. After two years of recession, with a significant drop in tax collection and uncontrolled spending, the deficit began make an appearance. And the deficit had to be financed, the refusal to raise taxes, via emsión debt. Debt

buying international funds to which both are accused of speculators, but at the end of the day are those who continue to spend blithely allowed this government in their actions as reckless. Now, the same funds see that our government is doing nothing to prevent continued to spend, and are afraid you do not end up paying what they owe, so do not want to know about our economy. Require higher rates of return to be with our bond debt, ran away from our businesses and investment away. The problem is such that even the Euro, the which is part of Spain, begins to look like a currency that loses value, causing the holders of euros to undo their positions and prefer to be with a currency more valuable.

Once again, Keynes seemed to be our savior of the disaster and in the 30's, however, as then, the implementation of its action leads to a state debt crisis, unemployment and economic stagnation as occurred in 70's. Now, who saves us from him?

Has Anyone Had Laser Gum Therapy Surgery 2010

Synthetic Biology

is a pleasure as always enjoy Networks Punset with Eduard and their guests. In the program last weekend (no 58 ), Played the fascinating world of synthetic biology , a branch of biology, genomics that focuses on the study of interactions and relationships that lead out proteins that are part of the cell .

His guest, Luis Serrano is one of the foremost experts on the subject worldwide and we are fortunate to have their equipment and research in Spain. At the Center for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona holds its efforts to unravel the mechanisms explaining those relations that exist between proteins. Thus, we may create or modify organisms as bacteria, that are capable of producing within a cell, the reactions necessary to cure such diseases as cancer, Alzheimer's disease.

At the end of the wonderful and entertaining talk, Luis Serrano Punset question by philosophical ethical questions that may arise from the creation of synthetic life in a laboratory. The eminent researcher replied that religious debates aside the idea of \u200b\u200bplaying God, the true ethical, philosophical and social development of this type of research is the enormous gap that can be created between those countries that can pay these advances and On the other hand, countries that do not have that capability.

Clearly, and Luis Serrano mention it clearly, that one of the more obvious forms of inequality in the nearest future, not only because of economic or productive type, but of knowledge. Science and progress will establish a dividing line between rich and poor societies, where wealth and poverty can not be measured in exclusive economic vision, but in the possession of knowledge and implementation capacity. As a sociologist, relationships and social consequences of science and knowledge are one of the topics that I love and attraction. Even

Mr. Serrano is allowed to play the role of science fiction writer, to say that the possibilities for changing that may enable synthetic biology, opening the possibility of a real genetic change in humans, ie, to cause an evolutionary change. This will, of giving the event, the existence of more advanced human genetically speaking against others who can not afford it.

Fascinating, is not it, what do you think, dear readers? I have wanted to know their views on the subject.

Purple Rash Outer Thigh

World Day of Press Freedom

We went through Earth Day and Mother's Day, it's not that they are unimportant, but I'm surprised they have more impact than the World Day of Press Freedom. In a world where only 16% of the world's population can enjoy a free media, I think, is not defended as befits one of the faces most important and fundamental freedom.

And unless exceptions concern, freedom of speech and press often go hand in wealth and affluence. No wonder then, that is in poor countries where more highlight this lack of freedom of communication media.

One point that concerns me personally is Latin America, where the free expression of the media is increasingly exposed to attacks by oppressive interests. As Cuba and Venezuela the saddest examples of the same.

Without freedom of opinion, expression and press freedom can hardly be safeguarded individual and be released, abuses against that of those who hate freedom.


MAP OF PRESS FREEDOM 2010 FREEDOM HOUSE

Milena Velba Bouncing

Standard & Poor's punishing us and we get angry

My nephew is seven years and each time her mother punished, not usually understand at first it is your fault and angry. However, gradually becoming aware of their actions and their responsibilities and, therefore, sometimes about-faced mimes and asks: "Is this that you punish me?".

Government Spain is like my nephew, but with the difference that has not yet accepted that the punishment being imposed on us market your fault, and nobody else. We are paying the lack of credibility caused by the constant flirtation measures of our economic policy. The lack of conviction at the time to explain our plan of adjustment, the lack of will to take charge and our labor market flexibility and the neglect and political intervention which is carrying out the re-structuring of our financial system (especially in the field of investment funds). But worse than all this, is the image that is transmitted to disability, lack of discipline and inability to accept economic reality and not remain fixed in a parallel world where recovery seems imminent.

discourse can grab a more anti-capitalist and anti-system and question the professionalism of S & P, one of the rating agencies "that gave the highest credit rating to a financial product such as CDO's that have caused the crisis. However, that speech should not blind us to the implication that is a lowering our risk rating . Doing so is like one who does not accept the theory of gravity and just launching off a cliff, shouting that what I say Newton give a damn.

But what a fall of "rating"? Basically that in order to place our debt, that is, let us get money from abroad is going to get out more expensive. Why?, Because investors are wary of our economy or our ability to fix our problems and instead of the vile money, we ask for more guarantees, ie, we pay a higher interest rate. Would you leave money at the same price to a person with clear ideas, that comprehensively tells how it will solve its economic dilemmas and besides all this, has already begun to take action, against another person who is characterized by just the opposite? Markets either.

This is reflected first in the English bond spread to 10 year high against the German 10-year bond (you know, these Teutons are serious people, applied work, so the market compared us with them), found in the 110 basis points (1.1 percentage points), ie that if the Germans have to pay interest of 3.03% by placing your debt, we have to offer 4.14% to be attractive to investors. And that means that we finance ourselves is more expensive. But how much more or less? Well according to Expansion "gross issues still to be done this year (€ 62,304.19 million) will cost around 3,160 million more (During the entire life of the debt), compared to what would have taken place that much last year. "This means more pressure to control the runaway deficit that we suffer, further vitiating the vicious circle, which leaves only more spending cuts or increased revenue via more taxes.

But really we are suspicious of foreign investors, or are a group of greedy capitalists wanting more and more money? For the truth is that distrust and much, and also, as good capitalists want more and more money, and do not want to lose a penny. So hire a CDS (Credit Default Swap or English castizo, credit default swap) is more expensive. What the heck is a CDS? It is an insurance contract guaranteeing the purchaser, in this case English debt, if the Kingdom of Spain does not meet its obligations, the buyer will not lose your investment. This financial instrument measures whether people are wary of Spain, because as any of us if we do not trust a seller, how to seek a waiver to protect you. And the English CDS market not to rise, as more and more people think there is a risk on yet, but this, that the Treasury HACA crack.


Does this only the state? No, of course not, also directly affects corporate bonds issued to finance our businesses. As the Treasury should offer more attractive returns for investors, our companies should also provide, because of this fall's rating higher interest rates for someone to buy their debt. This coupled with the severe lack of liquidity that are living our business, due to tap funding cut of our financial system, may cause a worsening of the crisis, as the investment plans, ie, new projects should put in place, ie to grow the business profits and therefore, create jobs, stop.

Do you think now the situation serious? I think that should not be taken lightly, as much as you do not fully trust these rating agencies. Unfortunately our government, like my nephew, take the path of the tantrum and anger rather than act accordingly. kicking Ms. Fernández de la Vega and Mr. Salgado , while both our Prime Minister is still trying to convince us that the situation has reached its most catastrophic and whatever comes will improve once again.

is true that we are far from the situation in Greece, but that did not prevent the ears do not wolf before he bites us. We are warning you, certainly not worth the tears.

Lorac Blushes Swatches

Stories Revolutionary Bolivarian presents: Evo, GM and bald Chueca

Bolivarian Revolutionary Stories of Yesterday and Today presents "Evo, GM and Chueca bald."

Once upon a time there was a leader of coca aymara Bolivia with presidential claims that one day he won the elections in their country, thanks to the friends of Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS) . Evo Morales call him and known everywhere for their traditional sweaters and his defense of "Pachamama " above all, managed to fight with multinational mining and mayors of the country, neighbors American and of course, the Empire. Now that Avatar is present in the mind of every good environmentalist well, and many saw in him, the true warrior in blue, the skies in defense of the poor, the disadvantaged and the planet's health.

tireless in their fight, he decided, along with other advocates in the area, forming a "chuli Pandi" that neither Super Friends and the Super Commander Chávez, Morales Captain Planet, Batman Correa, Ortega and Robin Kirchner Wonder Woman struggle to discouragement and exhaustion from everything that you want to end the "Bolivarian Revolution" and "XXI century socialism."

Among the great enemy of the good socialist Bolivarian are the GM cause, according exact words of the great Evo " seems normal baldness is a disease in Europe, almost all are bald, and this is for things eat, while indigenous peoples are not bald, because they eat other things . " So, we know the origin of baldness among his perfidious gripping hair and hairy fingers to Europe. But not content with it, has found the cause of homosexuality, quote: "The chicken we eat is full of female hormones. Therefore, when men eat those chickens, have deviations in their being like men. ".


Statements in Chueca have caused a huge stir, but also the more traditional and reactionary campaigns such as "In public school, or female chickens or chicken." However, the most exalted reactions have come from the Gay and Lesbian partnerships, well, the representative of "Gays, Lesbian, Transgender, Gender Neutral, Lady Gaga and Roll Esteban ", better known by its acronym" GALESTRANGENLAGAESTE " stated that it is true that a more homo by eating chicken adulterated female hormones, but by eating "@ s poll the more fat the better."


What new adventures lie ahead of the intrepid Captain Planet Morales and his Super Friends? Do not despair, sure that will soon return to hear from them. Meanwhile, do not forget marximizarse or super-socialize .

When Will The Body Style For The Yukon Change

Young Chavez

Every good messianic and totalitarian leader, in youth a perfect tool for the propaganda of its program of terror and, of course, a future field of acolytes. If from an early age instilled in children and young people an idea repeatedly, doctrinaire and dogmatic is achieved, after a time, individuals devoid of individuality, that is, they get a body unable to discuss the establishment.

was in his time at Sparta and more recently with Hitler Hitler Youth , Mussolini with Balilla and Arditi , or Franco at first with the Arrows and Pelayos and later the Youth Front , without forgetting the Movement Pioneers of the Soviet Union. The President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez could not be less than their counterparts dictators and just create "Guerrillas Communicational ", to which a few days ago they just took oath




a sad step towards dictatorship Venezuela.

Good Spa In Vegas To Cruise Gay

Why you're not liberal?

Many of my friends and colleagues ask me why I'm liberal. However, this time I return I ask all my readers and visitors. Respond, why are not you liberals?

What Causes Skin Blisters On The Buttocks

who gets it follows: air wedding between Caixanova and Caixa Galicia.

the end it appears that the fate of the Galician boxes look the same, fusion. For the ordinary people we have sold the outcome as the only possible and valid to safeguard the future of Galicia. My biggest regret is that the arguments advanced by advocates of essences homelands have been scarce on what's important, economically, and very neat (in every sense) in the ideological and symbolic. A review of the opinion columns of the regional press, TV, radio and the Internet is shown. Few dissenting voices was that official discourse, and not contrary to the merger, but they desired a little caution and rationality to the process. As always, the interventional device is much more able to convince public opinion and protectionist rhetoric, leaving little ground to arguments for greater space for the free market.

In my blog I have defended by active and passive, non-interventionism of the Xunta, considering, and not for ideological reasons related to liberalism (which I have), that the merger did not arise from a real need and motivation economic, but political. What does this mean? For the solution of the problems surrounding the Galician savings banks are not going to solve a political move, since this solution imprisonment and aggravated the great failure of the system of boxes, its dependence on political power. However, few data analyze the possible future cash birth. Before

noblesse oblige to admit that I am far from an expert on this than whites technically called merger & acquisitions, commercial castizo that translate as mergers and acquisitions. My little knowledge of the subject does not prevent reading from here and there, concluded that for such a bonding process to succeed, must be met a series of fundamental preconditions, which can be collected at the reasons that cause this result. Schematically

fall into three main motivations that lead us to adopt a merger:

not necessary to be an expert in M \u200b\u200b& A to realize that at the junction of Caixanova and Caixa Galicia just have prevailed for its absence primarily economically motivated. Just read the chart to realize that personal motivations and hybrid have guided the process. Why?:

• Improvements in economic financial ratio does not seem to improve dramatically. The few data have seen the light of the report commissioned by the company Xunta KPMG tell us

1. the ROE (Return on Equity), an indicator that shows us the benefit to an investor on the capital amounts to a 13.2% in the new entity, as opposed to the original 7.95% 4.51% Caixanova and Caixa Galicia. We must be careful with this because, since, as this indicator divide net profit by net liabilities (equity + reserves), reserve the game distorts the comparison because the allocation to this account book is not the same amount in both boxes. In fact, Caixa Galicia has made provisions for reservations in higher quantity than its neighbor of Vigo, so its ratio out so low. Increased the numerator by the sum of these benefits, but the sum of the denominator is not an accurate picture of net liabilities of the two entities for reservations.
2. The Tier 1 ratio which measures the solvency of banks, has a limit set by the Basel Committee on Banking at 8%. Merging the two get over it by a narrow margin at 9.0%.
3. Efficiency, which measures the expenses we incur a bank to earn $ 100, gives a figure of 47.7%, compared with 41.0% of Caixanova and 45.8% of Caixa Galicia. This is one of the most striking indicators, it shows that the merger does not imply a gain in efficiency really important, but rather the opposite. Recall that the efficiency ratio through the banking sector in Spain is at 2008 data, 44.4%.

• Another issue that has not been discussed much is that a merger should be able to improve the synergy of a company. What do you mean by synergy? The ability to obtain separate benefits neither side could get. Do they exist? Absolutely, but lower than the required cuts are going to have to perform if they wish to exploit these synergies. Why? Because the business models of both boxes are duplicated in the original territory, resulting in an overlap of offices and activities of concern. This means that they will have to close branches and lay off people (see below) in greater quantities than if the merger had taken place with a box as Bancaja (Valencia) and Caja Madrid as its presence in Galicia is much lower.

• Finally, you can not hide that the real interest of political power is to continue relying on a financial institution to cover their political agendas. That is the great vice sector boxes. And this defect is not resolved because the composition of the new entity strengthens the presence of the Regional Government and the municipalities in the Assembly.

So far in fact, all messages and speeches have emphasized the beneficial process, but the KPMG report recognizes that the merger would be nothing more and nothing less than the closure of 280 offices and laying off 1,300 employees. Which makes sense considering that the two boxes share the main market and therefore the duplication of offices is outrageous ( see map). To this is added the internal struggles to achieve the headquarters, in a merger "normal" try to save costs, as seen here, the financial logic seems to be fulfilled, because according to press reports, the agreement is to locate the headquarters in Santiago de Compostela with two operational headquarters in A Coruña and Vigo. Where once there were two and it is logical that a stay of the merger are three. The effectiveness and efficiency in economic policy always so absent.